About Me

Name: TommyO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Lust For Power

It is difficult to verbalize my frustration with the latest step by the dhimmis in their march to unbridled power.
 
Once this abortion of legislation is implemented [no pun intended] the dhimmis will pass the 50% mark of the population dependent on government for their existence and substinence.  Add in the illegals, who will soon be sanctioned, and, while they will not be legally allowed to vote, doing so in most dhimmi controlled preceints is just a formality, we have the necessary 53% needed for non-stop control of the government, and the succeeding move to socialism.
 
Conservatives are taking on the visage of neanderthals.  Soon to be made extinct by laws which are made specifically to discourage productivity and dissent, but somehow prey on those who do, so as to pay for the slackers.
 
Very sad. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Veddy Interesting

Tigerhawk explains it all.
 
Don't look now.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Step Down The Road To Power

My letter to the Portland Pravda this morning.

Another step down the road to complete gummint control of your lives courtesy of the dhimmis.
Think of it this way.  If the dhimmis can, or just convince, approx 53% of the voters that they are dependent on gummint for their continued existence, the dhimmis are guaranteed continuous, unimpeded power.  Just take an inventory of those who would make up the 53%.  Start with the number of folks on the gummint payroll.  By the time this bill is in full force, how many more gummint drones will be created?  The class system, made infamous in the Soviet Union, will soon be the norm.  Where will you be on the ladder?  The vast majority will be at the bottom rung praying that the gummint will not take away their substinence, rationed health care, and pickup trucks.  Meanwhile, the Subaru - volvo crowd will luxuriate in their dachas in CE and Falmouth, K-Port etc.

Of course, when the gummint drone in charge of your medical file determines that you are really too old or not a valuable asset elegible for gummint payment for that hip replacement or, [how long do you want to live, pal?]cancer treatment, kiss you a$$ goodbye.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Define Moderate,Please

Just reading up on NY-23, as well as other posts, blogs, etc addressing "moderates" in politics.
 
Never seem to read about moderate dhimmis, only moderate repubs.  Are there any moderate dhimmis? 
 
Would one define a moderate dhimmi and a moderate repub as having the same approach to most issues?  It seems to me that, as defined by the pundits, liberals and moderate dhimmis are one and the same, and "moderate republicans' can only earn the label by rolling as far to the left of what used to be Republicanism as they can.
 
Sad, but true.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Too Good To Be Lost

It is probably illegal to post a complete article without permission, but this is so good, it needs to be preserved.  From The American Spectator:
 
Yes, "The One" Should Fail
 

We will not be intimidated, we will not be bullied, we will not be silenced, and we will not lose. Barack Obama's thugocracy is dishonest, dangerous, and malicious, but it cannot be stronger than the aroused might of a free people. His foreign policy deliberately debases U.S. interests rightly understood, in an effort to suborn our sovereignty in favor of a United Nations he in turn wants to control. But even on foreign policy, there are certain checks on his power that can be called into play. We who oppose his aims -- yes, Michael Wilbon (Washington Post sportswriter who blasted Rush Limbaugh), we who hope that Obama, who happens to be "a black man," fails, and fails miserably at those ends -- must not, however, fall into Obama's Alinskyite traps. We must keep our own eyes on the ball.

The ball right now is the unprecedented power grab in the name of health care. That is Obama's whole immediate domestic ball of wax. Because Obama is losing on the issue, losing quite badly, in the court of public opinion, he is trying to change the subject and distract our attention so we, the broad American public, will ease our pressure against Democrats skittish of doing a lemming act on health care. If we ease our pressure on them on health care in order to fight Obama on other fronts, those skittish Democrats might succumb to the White House pressure instead and use parliamentary tricks to pass the legislative monstrosity Obama seeks.

That's what the attack on Fox News is all about: It's a distraction. That's what the attack on Rush Limbaugh was and is: a distraction. Attack on the TEA partiers: distraction. Attack on insurance companies, and so on and on: distraction. distraction, distraction, distraction. "The basic tactic in warfare," wrote Obama's organizational idol, Saul Alinsky, "is a mass political jujitsu." And "the real action is in the enemy's reaction." And "the major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition," so "pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

In response, we can't afford to let the attacks go unanswered, but we also can't afford to let them dominate our attention. We can't let the Left pick and freeze the target. We need to swat them down, and keep moving against the main Obama power grab.

All that said, others (like The American Spectator's own Phil Klein, who has done yeoman's work on the issue) can highlight the Left's main weak points regarding Obamacare. Let this column instead catalogue the ways in which the Obamites try to bully us, silence us, etcetera -- so that with this catalogue in one handy place, the rest of the movement can focus instead on Obamacare's weaknesses.

If you follow this roundabout logic so far, then:

Note, and don't allow it, when this administration tries to keep insurance cooperatives (Humana) from communicating with their own customers. Note, and don't allow it, when it targets a whole industry (insurers again) for attack. Note when it bullies car companies and banks. Note when it threatens the Chamber of Commerce. Note when it puts out booklets equating conservative veterans and activist groups with hate militias. Note when the president himself says he will "call out" those who disagree with him, that he will "not abide" us, that his opponents are "filling the airwaves with deceptive and dishonest ads" when the ads are actually factual. Note when he repeatedly accuses his opponents of using "scare tactics," yet in the next breath says "if we do nothing, our deficit will grow. More families will go bankrupt. More businesses will close. More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it the most. And more will die as a result." And then, having said that doing nothing will make more people die, he accuses those who don't agree with him of wanting to do nothing. Nice smear, that.

Note when the administration and its lackeys attack Fox News and when they attack Limbaugh. Note when they tell an Arizona sheriff that he's not allowed to tell the press about his pickups of illegal aliens. Note when they fire Inspectors General who embarrass their friends, after telling one of them that he too isn't allowed to talk to the press. Note when they tell towns in North Carolina that they cannot hold nonpartisan elections because blacks need to know who the Democrat is -- even if the town itself is majority black and voted to hold its elections in a non-partisan way. Note when they condone vote fraud and voter intimidation when it suits their purposes. Note when they drop an already-won case against vicious New Black Panther Party members. Note when they accuse Americans of being "a nation of cowards" on race. Note when they blame every problem on their White House predecessors. Note how they lock Republicans out of committee meetings. Note how they refuse to let the public have time to read legislation before it is voted on. Note how they vote on legislation that isn't actually even in one written piece yet.

They promise transparency, but they stonewall legitimate Freedom of Information Act requests on subject after subject. They stonewall legitimate information requests even from ranking congressmen. They refuse to turn over information about the fired or disciplined Inspectors General. They won't turn over information about their decision to subvert Honduran constitutional democracy in favor of an anti-American leftist thug. They won't turn over information about the New Black Panther decision. They lie about who made the decision. They lie about their efforts to politicize recipients of government arts grants. They brag about controlling information given to the press, and about controlling the press itself. They have a communications director who idolizes mass murderer Mao Tse-tung. They have a manufacturing czar who also speaks favorably about Mao. They have a science czar who quotes Mao, and who says it is not unconstitutional to coerce abortions or to put prophylactic chemicals into the drinking water (!!!).

Their attorney general refuses to protect the civil rights of white people (unless the whites are gay). Their Justice Department drops cases against an allied governor of New Mexico -- yes, that's called interfering with prosecutorial decisions. They gut the public integrity section of Justice. They ignore career prosecutors in the civil rights division and in the appellate division. The attorney general also overrides the established position of the division charged with constitutional interpretation (after pledging to support the division's independence).

The Obamites unilaterally violate the sanctity of contracts (and probably the Constitution) to gut the ownership rights of secured creditors and expand the unearned ownership by the unions. They threaten businesses that won't jump in line behind their takeover plans. They set up a pay czar who threatens to literally force executives to accept "negative" salaries. And when faced with complaints about utterly abusive new regulations that will criminalize people holding garage sales and put hundreds or thousands of businesses out of, yes, business, they loudly boast that "there's a new sheriff in town." And they invite foreign authorities, at the expense of our civil liberties, to regulate us further.

And, of course, they say their opponents are all racists, or they say that honest citizens speaking up of their own free will at town hall meetings are thugs and haters and rabbles and mobs and should probably be shut down.

I could go on, but that's enough for now. We will not be shut down. We will not relent. We will not be intimidated by false accusations of racism, or of greed, or of hatred, or of any other ill motives. We are motivated by love of country, and of freedom. And we will keep working to keep our country free.

We will do so whether or not the president can "abide" us and whether or not he calls us out. Actually, let him call us out. We call him out, too. In the light of day and the light of reason, we are more in our element than he is. We will win, and he will fail. And that's a good thing.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do Mark Steyn and then Charles Krauthammer

Pick up C H from the link in the article.
 
Are these guys in Washington adults?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hello CIA

Just read that the CIA is developing software to monitor blogs and social networking sites, presumably for homeland security intel.  Thought that this would be the job of NSA who would then feed the appropriate agencies soft info and/or hard intel as developed.
 
Is the CIA doing this only for themselves or will they share the results with the rest of the gummint?
 
Anyway, just thought I would sign on so I can be monitored.  (note:  also on facebook)
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Michael Yon - On Target Once Again

Please see this dispatch from MY on Afghanistan.  Reminiscent of '63-'64 situation in Vietnam. Assist in the assination of the leadership to buy some time? 
 
The comments make an interesting read, but most do not attend the central points of the article.  Understand that 'The One' has his people actively reading up on the early sixties mistakes by LBJ, and the subsequent large scale commit of combat troops into the bottomless pit. 
 
The leadership of the Taliban rests comfortably in Pakistan , along with AQ, similar to the VC leadership in the Parrot's Beak of Cambodia, relatively untouched. 
 
Do not be surprised when 'The One' dumps Afghanistan.  It is in the way.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

VDH Does It Again!!

If this guy was a baseball player, he would own the home run record, forever.  Go, Victor, Go!
 
What 'The One' and his cohorts do not understand is that the folks eventually see through the bulls..t, and the emperor has no clothes.  I feel that Obamar (Teddy K pronunciation) has reached that point.  The fate of this presidency may hang on his ability to herd enough dhimmis to the healthcare stables, and bring them along on the coming pullout from Afghanistan.  He is trying to stretch out his decision until after the healthcare finale, but if the current bad news stays in the headlines, his hand may be forced.  Defeat in Afghanistan and made to look foolish and incompetent by the Iranians could make "The One' irrelevant for the next three years.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Soitingly, It's Bush's Fault

Amazing!  The One spends several million of our dollars to fly in to Copenhagen with an enterauge of pretty ladies in order to help the citizens of Illinois lose millions more on the Olympics. When the bid is lost, the libs blame Bush!
 
All Obama, all day, every day.  When does it stop and some governing begin? 
 
Here is a very interesting article on the permanent campaign.  It says it much better than I can.
 
Oh, and if you wish to know how dumb you are to be an 'in the trenches conservative', not following the lead of our beatified intellectual 'true conservative' leaders, just go get insulted by Scott Johnson of Powerline.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Maine Republicans?

Correspondence with the Maine GOP this past week. Starts with my note to the executive director.







Dear Michelle:



Since the installation of the current congress, our senators have

consistently supported the democrat program.



Does the Maine Republican Party have a position on this duplicitous

conduct, and, does the party intend to offer financial and moral support

to the re-election of Senator Snowe in 2012?







Tom,







[from the Maine Chair]



Tom, thanks for your note. I am absolutely convinced that our Senators are

voting in the manner that they believe represents the viewpoint of Maine

citizens. As Republicans we have had no success in electing conservative

candidates to public office. Thus Maine House 95 democrats- 55

republicans----Maine Senate 20 democrats-15 republicans. My charge as the

new state party chairman is to re-build the party and elect more

republicans-------- once we are able to do that I feel that our Senators

will realize that Maine is not the welfare state, that 30+ years of one

party control (Democrats) has created .Once we can prove this to them, I 'm

sure their opinions on several issues will be different. thanks again for

your e-mail Charlie Webster

ps, the Maine Republican Party as I understand it has never been in a

financial position to donate money to either Senator





Dear Charles:



Thank you for the reply to my message of last week.



If we are to believe that the people of Maine are overwhelmingly in

favor of the President's policies, and that fact would obligate our

senators' predilection to vote against the Republican position [Snowe: 

65.5% vote against  and Collins: 57.6% against] [ref- Washington

Post/votes database], why do these folks run as, and continue to be,

ostensibly, Republicans with the whole hearted support of the party?



I am mystified. 



It can not be a comfortable position to be the chairman of the state

party that contains two of the most anti-republican and pro-democratic

representatives in Washington.  Of course, one should be grateful to

have the tepid support for the national program that we receive from

the ladies as an Allen/Andrews/Pingree et al would be a solid 100%.



However, I fear that I am beating a dead horse, so this will be the end

of the commenting on the ineptitude of our senators. Ineptitude?  Even

a novice politician would have recognized the immense power our

senators possessed as applied to the stimulus bill, and the total

failure to apply same.  They could have written the entire

bill!
  But, no, a pledge from the democrats to reduce an 800

billion boondoggle to 700 billion that was later ratcheted up to 900

billion is trumpeted as success for moderation.  Shameful.  And what

does Maine get out of all this spending, not to mention the 8500

earmarks in the omnibus spending bill, also supported by our

senators??  As far as I can tell, a couple of bridges, some lighthouses

to be painted, and unfunded mandates that after two years will add to

our already perilous local financial picture.



Did they get an invite to the Obamar super bowl party?



You are correct in your assessment of the political scene in Maine, and

your efforts to change the minds of the electorate regarding the never

ending free lunch provided by the democrats in Augusta.  I wish you

success in your endeavors, but it will be difficult to preach

conservatism to the masses who must view The Republican Party positions

through the prism of our senators, at the very least, as dhimmi lite,

if not fully seated at the feet of The One.



All the best,



Thomas A. O'Reilly

South Portland







Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Out Of Breath

I remember once getting into a flag football game [at the time I weighed a whopping 145 pounds], and was placed in the backfield as the blocker for the quarterback.  This sounded out as a reasonable proposition until I looked across the line at a gorilla-like apparition that was the defensive lineman.  I was just a little worried, but was assured by my captain that he had everything under control and, at the very least, all I had to do was chip block the gargantuan after he had been taken care of by our stalwart offensive line, and our star passer would have completed his play for a touchdown.

Stop me if you have  heard this story before.

My captain, in spite of his assurances to the contrary, missed his block.  Cringing, I assumed the blocking position [as seen on TV], and prepared to meet my maker.  The guy hit me so hard that I literally was lifted off my feet and landed some five feet to the rear in the lap of our star.  I could not breathe nor move.  On top of the pain, embarrassment, and inability to move my extremities, the monster gazed down on my inert body and sneered.  Oh, the shame of it all!  Because I was out of breath, I could not respond.  I got up and tried again, and eventually the cocky, big guy got tired and I was able to pick him off toward the end.  Didn't do me much good though.  Took a long time to heal.

That is kind of how I feel about the recent events in Washington.  Kicked in the chest by my president and his minions.  Worse yet, I have been betrayed by the republicans I voted for, Snowe and Collins.  What a tragedy!  The Maine press, as expected, is hailing the unselfish acts of mercy of my senators as pure bi-partisanship.  Can't take anymore.  Need to retire to catch my breath and heal my broken spirit. I voted for republican women and got Allen and Andrews in a dress.

How long will it take for the apparent 50% of the American public, that is enthusiastically embracing socialism, to wake up to the cruel hoax being played upon them?  Do not look behind the curtain.  Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.  Just watch the beautiful show on the TV.  Everything will be alright.  Just listen to what I say. Questions are insulting to one of my stature.

May I recommend Mark Steyn for your reading pleasure.  Mark, along with Victor David Hanson gets it right, and helps to relieve shortness of breath.

There is hope.  Pitchers and catchers have reported.  The snow will soon melt.  Chalk lines will be laid down.  The plate will be dusted.  Spikes will claw out a stance in the box.  Toeing the rubber, the hurler will stare down the batter.  The umpire, " I call em as I sees em", squats and cries out - Play Ball!  Life is good.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Low Can You Go?

Tried to get thru to Collins and snowe this morning.  Could not get thru to DC, so did talk to staffers in Portland.  Unloaded on them re the reprehensible actions of both senators, but that will do no good.  Both of them feel too secure to worry about outraged republicans.  No doubt.

Very concerned about the National Health Coordinator to be established in the White House.  Right out of Daschle's book that regards seniors as dispenseable commodities.  Too bad.  This thing is going to be law and there is no stopping it.  I fear how big and odious it will be when it emerges from conference.

Read an article today that implies that half of America is not only comfortable with socialism, but welcomes it.  If we have truly reached 50/50 on our mode of governance, implementation of this crock of garbage can only hasten a further deterioration.  Get your hands out, ladies and gentlemen, the free lunch is just around the corner.  I laughed at the video of the black woman who, during the campaign, praised obamar and declared that she would no longer have to make her car payment nor pay the rent!  Who is laughing now?  It ain't me!

Too much work to link all the great stuff available on the net today.  You know who to read.  This dude is absolutely scary on foreign policy.  His presser last night, especially on Iran, had to have the mullahs hysterical with joy.  They now know that they are dealing with a neophyte, anf the road ahead is wide open.  Eastbound and down!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The End Is Near

The Maine Sunday Whatever Demcrat in-house Propaganda Telegram leads today with a sob story above the fold on the heroic efforts of Susan Collins [D-Maine] to lead a bi-partisan, compromise effort to clean up the 'stimulate this' bill by reducing same from 900 bill to 825 bill.  Staggering!  I voted republican and got Tom Allen in a dress [at least philosophically].  I don't think Tom would double-cross his party for self-aggrandizement.  He is a loyal trooper. 

No sense in trying to dissect this monstrosity here [see a myriad of excellent columns and blogs doing the hard work, you know where to look]. 

Collins now threatens to abandon fellow turncoats Snowe and Spectre, and vote NO on the final bill when it returns from conference, if it does not meet her criteria for reduction in frivolous spending [italics - mine].  Of course, nowhere is it mentioned that she will vote with the dhimmis to effect cloture, and effectively cast an aye vote as it can not be defeated if it gets to the final vote stage.  CHICANERY AT ITS BEST. Keep your eye on the ball folks.  Which shell is it under? 

So, the question is:

What do Snowe and Collins get out of this deal?  Spectre we know, is grandstanding for the dhimmi vote in Pennsylvania in 2010, and although Olympia is  not up until 2012, she has no problem in Maine, no matter what she does, including switching partys, should she be so inclined.  Switching destroys her image of 'middle of the road, bi-partisan, even handed, I am a female, so I deserve your vote' campaign rhetoric, so she won't do that.  A golden girl, to be sure.
 
Back to Collins.  We will have to wait and see.  It should not take long. I hope she has bargained with the dhimmis for something substantial that will help Maine, and has not done this for the sole purpose of covering Susan Collins with the cape of the lone crusader, [can more Sunday talk shows be near, or perhaps Larry King] although I suspect that this is the true story.  "Un-talented back-bencher seeks limelight by betraying party principles" reads the real headline.

Oh well.  Readers of this blog [I believe I am the only one] will remember my rants at the RINO Collins and my threats to do anything to deny her the nomination for re-election.  Not only was there no follow-thru on my promises, I actually put a Collins sign on the front lawn and voted for her.  Why?  My choice was no vote or go for Tom Allen.  Allen was and is a clone of Tom Andrews, and I could not bear to deal with that.

However, as stated above, I got Tom Allen in a dress.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234567891011Next »