Posted by
TommyO on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:33:31 AM
From NRO this morning. Why can't I write like VDH?
"Obama the Magician [Victor Davis Hanson]
I
think the speech has wowed Obama’s base, yet after its mesmerizing
delivery wears off, it will perhaps raise more questions with most
others.
The Obama narratives suggest a disturbing lack of
responsibility, or of any notion of free will. Michelle, for example,
apparently had no free will in taking out big loans to go to Harvard
Law School, only pique that they must be paid back.
Barack had
likewise no free will in allying himself as friend, parishioner, and
confidant with an abject racist who is now evolved into a “former”
pastor, and a “scholar” and “an occasionally fierce critic of American
domestic and foreign policy” and “controversial” (apparently “not
particularly controversial” is now inoperative).
Indeed, the
last thing Obama wants, in fact, is an honest, painful discussion about
race in America, especially how centuries of racism, but also as well
as present demagogic leadership, white guilt, and ineffective and
counterproductive government programs, have all factored into present
endemic problems of illegitimacy, extraordinary high crime rates, and
often racist narratives from the likes of Wright and Farrakhan to rap
music — and yet have not precluded the amazing success and parity with
the rest of America on the part of well over half of the
African-American community.
Two corollaries always follow the
Obama victimology: moral equivalence and the subtle suggestion that any
who question his thesis of despair are themselves suspect.
So we
hear of poor Barack’s grandmother’s private fears in the same breath as
Wright’s public hatred. Geraldine Ferraro is understood in the same
context as Reverend Wright. The Reagan Coalition and talk radio are
identical to Reverend Wright — albeit without similar contexts for
their own purported racism. Your own pastor, priest, or rabbi are
analogous to Rev. Wright.
And then, of course, your own motives
are suspect if you question any of this sophistry. For Michelle it is
always “they” who raised new obstacles against this deprived Ivy League
couple and their quest for the Presidency; for Barack it is those who
play “snippets”, or the system of “corporate culture” that has made
Wright the object of anger to similarly victimized poor white pawns.
The
message? Wright’s motives for espousing hatred are complex and
misunderstood; your motives for worrying about Obama and his Pastor are
simple and suspect.
When Obama the magician was all done this
morning, Obama was no longer under examination for terrible judgment in
subsidizing a racist by his association and purse, nor was even the
racist Wright under doubt; instead almost everyone else, from the
system to his grandmother, to talk radio, to corporate culture, to your
rabbi or priest suddenly was.
The result? This will apparently
play well with a Democratic African-American audience and white elite
liberals, who are already giddy and comparing the speech to Martin
Luther King’s best. In this way of thinking, after all, that for the
last seven years the most powerful diplomats in the world have been two
African-Americans counts little (Wright, for example, slurred Sec.
Rice), but that anyone would dare ask a presidential candidate to
dissociate himself from a racist counts a lot.
Yet in the
general election, millions will still remember how Obama’s pastor and
confidant Reverend Wright cursed their culture and their country, and
they will still remain confused about his relationship with and
influence upon their would-be next President—and in the end they will
be very much angered by all that indeed."
03/19 07:41 AM