About Me

Name: TommyO
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Maine Republicans?

Correspondence with the Maine GOP this past week. Starts with my note to the executive director.







Dear Michelle:



Since the installation of the current congress, our senators have

consistently supported the democrat program.



Does the Maine Republican Party have a position on this duplicitous

conduct, and, does the party intend to offer financial and moral support

to the re-election of Senator Snowe in 2012?







Tom,







[from the Maine Chair]



Tom, thanks for your note. I am absolutely convinced that our Senators are

voting in the manner that they believe represents the viewpoint of Maine

citizens. As Republicans we have had no success in electing conservative

candidates to public office. Thus Maine House 95 democrats- 55

republicans----Maine Senate 20 democrats-15 republicans. My charge as the

new state party chairman is to re-build the party and elect more

republicans-------- once we are able to do that I feel that our Senators

will realize that Maine is not the welfare state, that 30+ years of one

party control (Democrats) has created .Once we can prove this to them, I 'm

sure their opinions on several issues will be different. thanks again for

your e-mail Charlie Webster

ps, the Maine Republican Party as I understand it has never been in a

financial position to donate money to either Senator





Dear Charles:



Thank you for the reply to my message of last week.



If we are to believe that the people of Maine are overwhelmingly in

favor of the President's policies, and that fact would obligate our

senators' predilection to vote against the Republican position [Snowe: 

65.5% vote against  and Collins: 57.6% against] [ref- Washington

Post/votes database], why do these folks run as, and continue to be,

ostensibly, Republicans with the whole hearted support of the party?



I am mystified. 



It can not be a comfortable position to be the chairman of the state

party that contains two of the most anti-republican and pro-democratic

representatives in Washington.  Of course, one should be grateful to

have the tepid support for the national program that we receive from

the ladies as an Allen/Andrews/Pingree et al would be a solid 100%.



However, I fear that I am beating a dead horse, so this will be the end

of the commenting on the ineptitude of our senators. Ineptitude?  Even

a novice politician would have recognized the immense power our

senators possessed as applied to the stimulus bill, and the total

failure to apply same.  They could have written the entire

bill!
  But, no, a pledge from the democrats to reduce an 800

billion boondoggle to 700 billion that was later ratcheted up to 900

billion is trumpeted as success for moderation.  Shameful.  And what

does Maine get out of all this spending, not to mention the 8500

earmarks in the omnibus spending bill, also supported by our

senators??  As far as I can tell, a couple of bridges, some lighthouses

to be painted, and unfunded mandates that after two years will add to

our already perilous local financial picture.



Did they get an invite to the Obamar super bowl party?



You are correct in your assessment of the political scene in Maine, and

your efforts to change the minds of the electorate regarding the never

ending free lunch provided by the democrats in Augusta.  I wish you

success in your endeavors, but it will be difficult to preach

conservatism to the masses who must view The Republican Party positions

through the prism of our senators, at the very least, as dhimmi lite,

if not fully seated at the feet of The One.



All the best,



Thomas A. O'Reilly

South Portland







Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Out Of Breath

I remember once getting into a flag football game [at the time I weighed a whopping 145 pounds], and was placed in the backfield as the blocker for the quarterback.  This sounded out as a reasonable proposition until I looked across the line at a gorilla-like apparition that was the defensive lineman.  I was just a little worried, but was assured by my captain that he had everything under control and, at the very least, all I had to do was chip block the gargantuan after he had been taken care of by our stalwart offensive line, and our star passer would have completed his play for a touchdown.

Stop me if you have  heard this story before.

My captain, in spite of his assurances to the contrary, missed his block.  Cringing, I assumed the blocking position [as seen on TV], and prepared to meet my maker.  The guy hit me so hard that I literally was lifted off my feet and landed some five feet to the rear in the lap of our star.  I could not breathe nor move.  On top of the pain, embarrassment, and inability to move my extremities, the monster gazed down on my inert body and sneered.  Oh, the shame of it all!  Because I was out of breath, I could not respond.  I got up and tried again, and eventually the cocky, big guy got tired and I was able to pick him off toward the end.  Didn't do me much good though.  Took a long time to heal.

That is kind of how I feel about the recent events in Washington.  Kicked in the chest by my president and his minions.  Worse yet, I have been betrayed by the republicans I voted for, Snowe and Collins.  What a tragedy!  The Maine press, as expected, is hailing the unselfish acts of mercy of my senators as pure bi-partisanship.  Can't take anymore.  Need to retire to catch my breath and heal my broken spirit. I voted for republican women and got Allen and Andrews in a dress.

How long will it take for the apparent 50% of the American public, that is enthusiastically embracing socialism, to wake up to the cruel hoax being played upon them?  Do not look behind the curtain.  Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.  Just watch the beautiful show on the TV.  Everything will be alright.  Just listen to what I say. Questions are insulting to one of my stature.

May I recommend Mark Steyn for your reading pleasure.  Mark, along with Victor David Hanson gets it right, and helps to relieve shortness of breath.

There is hope.  Pitchers and catchers have reported.  The snow will soon melt.  Chalk lines will be laid down.  The plate will be dusted.  Spikes will claw out a stance in the box.  Toeing the rubber, the hurler will stare down the batter.  The umpire, " I call em as I sees em", squats and cries out - Play Ball!  Life is good.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Low Can You Go?

Tried to get thru to Collins and snowe this morning.  Could not get thru to DC, so did talk to staffers in Portland.  Unloaded on them re the reprehensible actions of both senators, but that will do no good.  Both of them feel too secure to worry about outraged republicans.  No doubt.

Very concerned about the National Health Coordinator to be established in the White House.  Right out of Daschle's book that regards seniors as dispenseable commodities.  Too bad.  This thing is going to be law and there is no stopping it.  I fear how big and odious it will be when it emerges from conference.

Read an article today that implies that half of America is not only comfortable with socialism, but welcomes it.  If we have truly reached 50/50 on our mode of governance, implementation of this crock of garbage can only hasten a further deterioration.  Get your hands out, ladies and gentlemen, the free lunch is just around the corner.  I laughed at the video of the black woman who, during the campaign, praised obamar and declared that she would no longer have to make her car payment nor pay the rent!  Who is laughing now?  It ain't me!

Too much work to link all the great stuff available on the net today.  You know who to read.  This dude is absolutely scary on foreign policy.  His presser last night, especially on Iran, had to have the mullahs hysterical with joy.  They now know that they are dealing with a neophyte, anf the road ahead is wide open.  Eastbound and down!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The End Is Near

The Maine Sunday Whatever Demcrat in-house Propaganda Telegram leads today with a sob story above the fold on the heroic efforts of Susan Collins [D-Maine] to lead a bi-partisan, compromise effort to clean up the 'stimulate this' bill by reducing same from 900 bill to 825 bill.  Staggering!  I voted republican and got Tom Allen in a dress [at least philosophically].  I don't think Tom would double-cross his party for self-aggrandizement.  He is a loyal trooper. 

No sense in trying to dissect this monstrosity here [see a myriad of excellent columns and blogs doing the hard work, you know where to look]. 

Collins now threatens to abandon fellow turncoats Snowe and Spectre, and vote NO on the final bill when it returns from conference, if it does not meet her criteria for reduction in frivolous spending [italics - mine].  Of course, nowhere is it mentioned that she will vote with the dhimmis to effect cloture, and effectively cast an aye vote as it can not be defeated if it gets to the final vote stage.  CHICANERY AT ITS BEST. Keep your eye on the ball folks.  Which shell is it under? 

So, the question is:

What do Snowe and Collins get out of this deal?  Spectre we know, is grandstanding for the dhimmi vote in Pennsylvania in 2010, and although Olympia is  not up until 2012, she has no problem in Maine, no matter what she does, including switching partys, should she be so inclined.  Switching destroys her image of 'middle of the road, bi-partisan, even handed, I am a female, so I deserve your vote' campaign rhetoric, so she won't do that.  A golden girl, to be sure.
 
Back to Collins.  We will have to wait and see.  It should not take long. I hope she has bargained with the dhimmis for something substantial that will help Maine, and has not done this for the sole purpose of covering Susan Collins with the cape of the lone crusader, [can more Sunday talk shows be near, or perhaps Larry King] although I suspect that this is the true story.  "Un-talented back-bencher seeks limelight by betraying party principles" reads the real headline.

Oh well.  Readers of this blog [I believe I am the only one] will remember my rants at the RINO Collins and my threats to do anything to deny her the nomination for re-election.  Not only was there no follow-thru on my promises, I actually put a Collins sign on the front lawn and voted for her.  Why?  My choice was no vote or go for Tom Allen.  Allen was and is a clone of Tom Andrews, and I could not bear to deal with that.

However, as stated above, I got Tom Allen in a dress.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DA STIMULUS BILL

I CAN NOT ADEQUATELY DESCRIBE MY COMPLETE REVULSION WITH THIS INSANITY!

SOMEWHERE DOWN THE ROAD, A BOOK WILL BE WRITTEN REVEALING THE TOTAL NARCISSITIC APPROACH TO THE WELFARE OF THE PEOPLES DISPLAYED BY OBAMAR AND THE DHIMMIS.

TommyO

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Woe Is Me!

In my last post, I indicated that I was back and ready to take on the Obamar machine for the next four years.

Yet, this morning, I am unable to put two coherent thoughts together because my old brain is addled by the unbelievable scams that the dhimmi triumverite of obamar, pelosi, and reid has foisted on the peoples.  All of this has been properly and exhaustively documented on the great conservative web sites [we must go there, as the msm will not give us the truth - some minor cracks in the wall are showing up, but minor they will remain] so I will not bother with a rehash.  Suffice to say that obamar [ I intend to not capitalize the dhimmi leadership names anymore as I can not find it in my heart to show respect for such out and out crooks] has set back TGWOT to an asonishing degree, not to mention a complete dissing of the military [10% reduction in funds while lavishing acorn and the baby killer industry with billions of our money]. 

Even if we are fortunate to get these people out of office in two or four years, the damage to the country will be enormous, and may take decades to repair.  If they manage to buy enough votes [ a very real possibility] then the country that I grew up in and continue to love will be no more.  We will be a cheap imitation of the euro-liberal socialists where the non-producers outnumber the producers, and an attribute to be aspired to is being a dhimmi. We stand idly by as the islamist jihadists continue to spew their hatred in our country, protected by the constitution that they wish to shred, in mosques and on web sites.

I am old and will not be around for the final days of the Republic [should things continue as they are] but I fear for my grand-children, as they are going to be the unwilling beneficiaries of the policies established by the blundering dhimmis now in power.

TommyO

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Back To The Wars

I shut down shortly before the election out of frustration at what I perceived what was to come [unfortunately I was correct], and maintained silence through the coronation last Tuesday until today.

The last few days have been as horrifying as I feared.  Payback to the ultra-left is in full swing.  Anti-terrorism measures that have kept us safe since 2001 are being instantly dismantled in favor of platitudes and rhetoric that will be recognized by our enemies as an invitation to attack us again, and this time, with impunity.

The gigantis dhimmi pork package, labeled as 'Stimulus' has bankruptcy  and socialization written all over it, and the Rrepublicans left in Ccongress have been castrated, and left impotent [can it be described as a self mutilation?]

Although only a voice in the wilderness, I will attempt to fight back with the only weapons at my disposal, words.

Do not falter, my friends, do not falter.

TommyO

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pay Attention ToThis Man

Best description of our Afghan Adventure I have read.

TommyO

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Come I am not As Smart As Thomas Sowell

This needs to read in full.


owell: Obama Win Would Be Historic Tragedy



Some elections are routine, some are important, and some are historic. If Sen. John McCain wins this election, it probably will go down in history as routine. But if Sen. Barack Obama wins, it is more likely to be historic — and catastrophic.

Once the election is over, the glittering generalities of rhetoric and style will mean nothing. Everything will depend on performance in facing huge challenges, domestic and foreign.

Performance is where Obama has nothing to show for his political career, either in Illinois or in Washington.

Policies he proposes under the change banner are almost all policies that have been tried repeatedly in other countries — and failed repeatedly in other countries.

Politicians telling businesses how to operate? That's been tried in countries around the world, especially during the second half of the 20th century. It has failed so often and so badly that even socialist and communist governments were freeing up their markets by the end of the century.

The economies of China and India began to take off into high rates of growth when they got rid of precisely the kinds of policies that Obama is advocating for the United States under the magic mantra of change.

Putting restrictions on international trade in order to save jobs at home? That was tried here with the Hawley-Smoot tariff during the Great Depression.

Unemployment was 9 percent when that tariff was passed to save jobs, but unemployment went up instead of down and reached 25 percent before the decade was over.

Higher taxes to "spread the wealth around," as Obama puts it? The idea of redistributing wealth has turned into the reality of redistributing poverty, in countries where wealth has fled and a lack of incentives has stifled the production of new wealth.

Economic disasters, however, may pale by comparison with the catastrophe of Iran with nuclear weapons. Glib rhetoric about Iran’s being "a small country," as Obama called it, will be a bitter irony for Americans who will have to live in the shadow of a nuclear threat that cannot be deterred, as that of the Soviet Union could be, by the threat of a nuclear counterattack.

Suicidal fanatics cannot be deterred. If they are willing to die and we are not, then we are at their mercy — and they have no mercy. Moreover, once they get nuclear weapons, that situation cannot be reversed.

Is this the legacy we wish to leave our children and grandchildren, by voting on the basis of style and symbolism, rather than substance?

If Barack Obama thinks that such a catastrophe can be avoided by sitting down and talking with the leaders of Iran, then he is repeating a fallacy that helped bring on World War II.

In a nuclear age, one country does not have to send troops to occupy another country to conquer it. A country is conquered if another country can dictate who rules it, as the Mongols once did with Russia, and as Osama bin Laden tried to do when he threatened retaliation against places in the United States that voted for President Bush. But he didn't have nuclear weapons to back up that threat — yet.

America has never been a conquered country, so it may be very hard for most Americans even to conceive what that can mean. After France was conquered in 1940, it was reduced to turning over some of its own innocent citizens to the Nazis to kill, just because those citizens were Jewish.

Do you think our leaders wouldn't do that? Not even if the alternative was to see New York and Los Angeles go up in mushroom clouds? If I were Jewish, I wouldn't bet my life on that.

What the Middle East fanatics want is not just our resources or even our lives, but our humiliation first, in whatever sadistic ways they can think of. Their lust for humiliation has been demonstrated repeatedly in their videotaped beheadings that find such an eager market in the Middle East.

None of this can be prevented by glib talk, but only by character, courage, and decisive actions, none of which Obama has ever demonstrated.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. 94305. To find out more about Sowell, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

© 2008 Creator's Syndicate Inc.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

William Ayers' forgotten communist manifesto: Prairie Fire

Not really hard to believe if you were around then. See Zombie.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Save For Posterity

From NRO 10/25/08.  could not be better said.


The Obama Temptation   [Mark R. Levin]

I've been thinking this for a while so I might as well air it here. I honestly never thought we'd see such a thing in our country - not yet anyway - but I sense what's occurring in this election is a recklessness and abandonment of rationality that has preceded the voluntary surrender of liberty and security in other places. I can't help but observe that even some conservatives are caught in the moment as their attempts at explaining their support for Barack Obama are unpersuasive and even illogical. And the pull appears to be rather strong. Ken Adelman, Doug Kmiec, and others, reach for the usual platitudes in explaining themselves but are utterly incoherent. Even non-conservatives with significant public policy and real world experiences, such as Colin Powell and Charles Fried, find Obama alluring but can't explain themselves in an intelligent way.

There is a cult-like atmosphere around Barack Obama, which his campaign has carefully and successfully fabricated, which concerns me. The messiah complex. Fainting audience members at rallies. Special Obama flags and an Obama presidential seal. A graphic with the portrayal of the globe and Obama's name on it, which adorns everything from Obama's plane to his street literature. Young school children singing songs praising Obama. Teenagers wearing camouflage outfits and marching in military order chanting Obama's name and the professions he is going to open to them. An Obama world tour, culminating in a speech in Berlin where Obama proclaims we are all citizens of the world. I dare say, this is ominous stuff.

Even the media are drawn to the allure that is Obama. Yes, the media are liberal. Even so, it is obvious that this election is different. The media are open and brazen in their attempts to influence the outcome of this election. I've never seen anything like it. Virtually all evidence of Obama's past influences and radicalism — from Jeremiah Wright to William Ayers — have been raised by non-traditional news sources. The media's role has been to ignore it as long as possible, then mention it if they must, and finally dismiss it and those who raise it in the first place. It's as if the media use the Obama campaign's talking points — its preposterous assertions that Obama didn't hear Wright from the pulpit railing about black liberation, whites, Jews, etc., that Obama had no idea Ayers was a domestic terrorist despite their close political, social, and working relationship, etc. — to protect Obama from legitimate and routine scrutiny. And because journalists have also become commentators, it is hard to miss their almost uniform admiration for Obama and excitement about an Obama presidency. So in the tank are the media for Obama that for months we've read news stories and opinion pieces insisting that if Obama is not elected president it will be due to white racism. And, of course, while experience is crucial in assessing Sarah Palin's qualifications for vice president, no such standard is applied to Obama's qualifications for president. (No longer is it acceptable to minimize the work of a community organizer.) Charles Gibson and Katie Couric sought to humiliate Palin. They would never and have never tried such an approach with Obama.

But beyond the elites and the media, my greatest concern is whether this election will show a majority of the voters susceptible to the appeal of a charismatic demagogue. This may seem a harsh term to some, and no doubt will to Obama supporters, but it is a perfectly appropriate characterization. Obama's entire campaign is built on class warfare and human envy. The "change" he peddles is not new. We've seen it before. It is change that diminishes individual liberty for the soft authoritarianism of socialism. It is a populist appeal that disguises government mandated wealth redistribution as tax cuts for the middle class, falsely blames capitalism for the social policies and government corruption (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) that led to the current turmoil in our financial markets, fuels contempt for commerce and trade by stigmatizing those who run successful small and large businesses, and exploits human imperfection as a justification for a massive expansion of centralized government. Obama's appeal to the middle class is an appeal to the "the proletariat," as an infamous philosopher once described it, about which a mythology has been created. Rather than pursue the American Dream, he insists that the American Dream has arbitrary limits, limits Obama would set for the rest of us — today it's $250,000 for businesses and even less for individuals. If the individual dares to succeed beyond the limits set by Obama, he is punished for he's now officially "rich." The value of his physical and intellectual labor must be confiscated in greater amounts for the good of the proletariat (the middle class). And so it is that the middle class, the birth-child of capitalism, is both celebrated and enslaved — for its own good and the greater good. The "hope" Obama represents, therefore, is not hope at all. It is the misery of his utopianism imposed on the individual.

Unlike past Democrat presidential candidates, Obama is a hardened ideologue. He's not interested in playing around the edges. He seeks "fundamental change," i.e., to remake society. And if the Democrats control Congress with super-majorities led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, he will get much of what he demands.

The question is whether enough Americans understand what's at stake in this election and, if they do, whether they care. Is the allure of a charismatic demagogue so strong that the usually sober American people are willing to risk an Obama presidency? After all, it ensnared Adelman, Kmiec, Powell, Fried, and numerous others. And while America will certainly survive, it will do so, in many respects, as a different place.

10/25 09:29 PM

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Susan the RINO

My note to Senator Collins 10/21/08:

Dear Senator Collins:

I looked, but did not see you at either Senator McCain's visit to Portland or Gov. Palin's visit to Bangor.  Are you not the campaign chair for McCain in Maine?
Judging by your condemnation of your party's candidate for president over the past weekend, and your unending rant on your 'bipartisinship' in commercial after commercial, I can only conclude that you continue to take Republican money and support, but are afraid to identify yourself as a Republican, and further believe, as was the case with Senator Cohen, your mentor, that you have the people of Maine fooled into believing you are an Independent.

How lucky you are that the people of Maine are not fooled by Tom Allen's crass liberalism, and that you will be re-elected not for your achievements, but the rejection of the Democrat philosophy.

Tom O'Reilly

Aint she a beaut?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WONDERING



The intensity and duration of the attacks on Gov Palin and family give me pause to wonder just what the hell the dhimmis are afraid of.

The sub-plot in the msm is the poor judgement [loose cannon- feeble minded old man move - obvious flim/ flam to pull in women - failure to vet Palin] of McC who is taking it to the chin from every angle.

In trying to sort out what is really going on, I am struck by the huge, one day upswing in contributions and the apparent forgiveness [if that is the right term] of the so-called evangelicals toward her problem with the daughter.  She, in my opinion, has a lot more going for her than 'evangelicals', if I am reading the blogs correctly.

Obamar's interview with CNN where he compares his experience to her experience [only as mayor] is a poor move on his part, as he is now running against her, rather than McC.  What's up with these people?

I think that she has more support now than before the pregnancy announcement, and will ride out all the smears and negatives that the Obamar/Soros machine can dig up.  In fact, I believe she now has the sympathy vote which will increase with each new attack.

Her appearance at the RNC is critical to the solidification of her initial support.  She must project the she is not just a woman running for office, she is a conservative running for office.

The dhimmis have made a bad call here.  The race is between Obamar and McCain, and it will quickly return to that venue next week.  Biden/Palin will be a great sideshow that will fall to Palin.  Biden is in a no-win situation with the female voter.

Questions will be answered, I believe, by next week.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Verification of the Emotion Theme

A while back I harped on the emotion vs issue theme that is carrying the Obamar canidacy.  Neat article on the American spectator about the opening of the Florida campaign HQ.

Here is the interesting tidbit: "
The crowd, Hard Case notwithstanding, was mostly a friendly and approachable bunch. So before the music (if such it was) got too loud for conversation, I managed to question several people about what it was about Obama that fetched them in. Most of the answers I got were variations on the theme of, "He touched my heart." No one said a single specific thing about a single public policy, but crooned that because of Obama's charisma and manifest goodness, he would be the one to make everything right in the areas of energy, education, war and peace, and the country's economic problems. Clearly the heart rather than the cerebral cortex is the proper organ through which to reach this bunch." [italics- mine - TommyO]

All of the exposed flips, flops, lies, etc will never touch the base.  They are emotionally involved and immune to criticism of the annoited one.

Gotta get to middle America, and that is thru the economy, the economy, the economy!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tears On The Pillow - Rebuttal

Dean Barnett has a post up on the Weekly Standard blog regarding Obamar screwups.
He is correct, but out of touch, in my opinion, with the reality of this election [as is McCain].  Here is my e-mail to Dean:

Dean:  None of this matters a farthing to the faithful.  He can do or say anything he wants on any issue as long as he dresses it up in the pink ribbon of 'change'.
Continuing to harp on Obamar screwups misses the point.
 
Recall my note to you that specified the entire operation is built on emotion, not facts, not policies, but emotion.
 
The true believers couldn't care less as they are paying no attention to you or any right side pundit, no matter how well you nail the b.....d!  They simply rely on the fawning MSM for their daily ration of the gospel according to Obamar.
 
So, the true measure of this election is how many true believers or how many lookin on without the foggy glasses.  How do you get to the latter?
 
The key to this election season is the congressional elections.  If every candidate, whether in a dhimmi safe district or not, hammered day and nite on the economy and why it tanked, and who is resposible, and make the dhimmis come to the table on this issue, problem solved.  The  main focus is on the economy.  By November, the working public [definitely not true believers] are going to be scared to death about their financial security.  Every day we hear about more plant closings [GM Ford etc], layoffs in supposedly safe environments [Citi - Chase - Brokers -Airlines], and all the businesses that service all of the above. This rolls downhill to the local car salesman, supermarket clerk, magazine staff writer, etc.
 
Dean, your magazine should be cataloging the impending disaster every day and forcing the info out to the public.  DRILL NOW is the headline.  The dhimmis have no answers, but are being allowed to float on sea of BS.
 
I am less than impressed with the righty press [with a few exemptions] efforts, It appears that you have ceded victory to the dhimmis.  The righty press seems content to congratulate themselves on the number of gaffes and/or position reversals that they can skewer Obamar with than winning the election in this most important year [see SCOTUS retirements]. 
 
I think this true of McCain also.  Every time a jerk like Clark opens his mouth, stop with the hurt feelings, go right back to the Obamar campaign pointing out that they are disguising their lack of answers on energy and the economy with senseless attacks with no basis.  Every day, all day!  By November, the working public really won't give a damn about Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan, they will want to know how they feed the kids, heat the house, and keep or find a job. The person with the answers WINS!
 
TommyO

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678910Next »